Concerning the searching and the seizure of my apparatuses by the senior police officers in my apartment on
05.05.1999 according to the decision of the 29.03.1999, NR: Gs 338/99
of the magistrates' court of the town of Zweibrücken, the magistrates' court of the town of Pirmasens had refused for the real reasons the opening of this procedure according to the decision of the 18.08.2000, NR: 4017 Js 3345/99.1 Ds.
The bill of indictment of the 21.12.2000 was confirmed that it is me which had faxed this famous letter the 25.03.1999 with the magistrates' court of the town of Pirmasens by insulting judge
By the decision of the 21.09.2000, NR: 4017 Js 3345/99 from the Public Prosecutor of the town of Zweibrücken had required of me to make the request for compensation within deadline a
six months. Naturally my former lawyer Mr. Beckert had asked for me a compensation of an amount of 200 DM (102,26€.) near this administration, concerning the apparatuses of occasion which I had necessarily
bought. Unfortunately I never obtained until now this compensation.
I received the 29.07.2002 the decision of the 19.06.2002, NR: 4220 E-32/00 of the general Public Persecutor of the town of
Zweibrücken. This decision refused my application of compensation which the Public Persecutor of Zweibrücken had recommended to me to make according to the decision of the 21.09.2000, NR: 4017 Js
3345/99. It was as confirmed in this decision of the 19.06.2002, as my former lawyer Mr. Münch had asked for the 21.09.2000 a compensation for an amount of 762,58 DM (389,90€.) for me, whereas this last
until now never informed me of that. I will make here the recourse near the higher magistrates' court of Zweibrücken, because the general Public Prsecutor of Zweibrücken gave me a three months deadline.
I carried felt sorry for the 11.02.2002 against judge Schiller of the magistrates' court of Pirmasens for reason: distort indictment with premeditation and abuse of power and I also carried
felt sorry for against the four senior police officers and the municipal civil servant of Pirmasens for reason: illegal seizure and violation of my apartment near the Public Persecutor of Zweibrücken.
A few weeks later I had requested my lawyer Mr. Karst to again ask for to me this compensation of an amount of 200DM (102,26€.) near this administration, and this was unfortunately without success.
through my maintenance of the 30.04.2002 with my lawyer Mr. Karst in his cabinet, this one said to me that, the senior police officers of Pirmasens had brought my apparatuses seized to its absence in its cabinet, and he
asked me to bring back them at home.
I refused this and I asked him to immediately return these apparatuses to the police force of Pirmasens, and it would be responsible for this as a long time as
these apparatuses would remain at its disposal.
I as immediately let know the office of the Public Persecutor of the town of Zweibrücken as I will take again my seized apparatuses that, when this
business would be cleared up.
I received the 23.05.2002 the decision of the 21.05.2002 of the Public Persecutor of Zweibrücken, which made me share that such a decision of the 29.03.1999, NR: Gs 323/99
which ordered this searching and this seizure of my apparatuses on 05.05.1999 in my apartment.
It is too late now, because the senior police officers had not given me this be-saying decision of the 29.03.1999,
NR: Gs 323/99 before penetrating in my apartment, and this decision never also existed during this procedure.
This decision of the 29.03.1999, NR: Gs 323/99 was not at all that which was given to me
by the senior police officer.
I have the impression that this decision of the 29.03.1999, NR: Gs 323/99 was made after the searching and the seizure of my apparatuses, because the senior police
officers had not given it to me.
Mrs. the Thomann prosecutor rejected my complaint introduced against judge Schiller and the senior police officers by the decision of the 16.07.2002, NR:.
4017 Js 002050/02 while justifying that the officers and the municipal civil servant had legally carried out the searching and the seizure according to the decision of the 29.03.1999, NR: Gs 323/99.
as confirmed in the latter as a written presentation of a search warrant is not necessary according to the law.
Article 13 subparagraph 1. of the constitutional laws guarantees the inviolability of the
apartment, because the order of a judge is very urgent.
The senior police officers again illegally abused me and this must absolutely again be cleared up.
I believe that my apartment is
not with the mill so that no matter who comes any time to do what good seems to him, or, me I am not protected by the German laws ?
I also believe that I am not the only person who was condemned by judge
Schiller during this period.
How judge Schiller could show me without any palpable proof, as soon as he had received this famous Fax !
Why one had not suitably inquired the number from
where the Fax came ?, whereas judge Schiller had informed me during the audience of the 25.03.1999, NR: 4017 Js 1142/98 that I will go immediately in prison, when I am again marked.
I have the impression here which one already very planned against me.
I made the recourse the 31.07.2002 against the stop of the lawsuit on 16.07.2002, NR: 4017 Js 002050/02 of the Public Persecutor of
Zweibrücken, near the general Public Persecutor of the town of Zweibrücken, because my current lawyer Mr. Brück
gave up the 30.07.2002 to make me this recourse, whereas I gave him a power of attorney since the
23.07.2002, from where the time will expire the 01.08.2002.
I believe here that the accused must be condemned, because they had cut me of any connection of communication with the world during this period, from
where my apparatuses were illegally seized.